Cascading Crisis in Iraqi Kurdistan

7/10/17 | 0 σχόλια | 0 απαντήσεις | 280 εμφανίσεις

By: Elizabeth Teoman with Noah Ringler and the ISW & CTP Teams

Key Takeaway: Iraqi Kurdistan’s drive for independence is generating new regional alignments that deepen Iranian – and potentially Russian – influence in Iraq at the expense of the United States. Turkey, Iran, and Iraq adopted a coordinated, aggressive force posture in retaliation for the Kurdistan Regional Government’s (KRG) independence referendum on September 25, 2017. The Iraqi Security Forces (ISF) conducted military exercises on the borders of Iraqi Kurdistan with the Turkish Armed Forces, the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, and Iranian Artesh. Turkey and Iran implemented a ban on direct flights from Northern Iraq on September 29. The ISF has also begun to establish security checkpoints at border crossings from Iraqi Kurdistan to Turkey and Iran. The tripartite has yet to enact economic embargos, although the three states threatened to block crude oil exports from the KRG following a temporary ban by Iran. Turkey, Iran, and Iraq nonetheless remain unlikely to escalate militarily in the near term. The U.S. has opposed the KRG’s unilateral campaign on the grounds that it will harm the prospects for a unified, independent, and representative Iraq. The tripartite response and Iran’s growing role also threaten that goal. 

The tripartite cooperation between Turkey, Iran, and Iraq builds upon preexisting multilateral frameworks that ultimately expand Iran’s regional influence and undercut American influence. Russia, Iran, and Syria have begun coopting elements of the Iraqi government into a ‘Quartet’ for operations along the Syrian-Iraqi Border. Russia and Iran have also drawn Turkey into a diplomatic process that favors their own interests through the Astana Talks on the Syrian Civil War. Iran will exploit these overlapping forums to expand and legitimize its destabilizing involvement in Iraq, Syria, and the wider Middle East. Russia also sees opportunity in these forums. It has set conditions to engage more deeply in Iraq amidst the uncertainty surrounding the KRG’s drive for independence. These forums will undermine the prospects for establishing independent, representative, and unitary states in Iraq and Syria – a requirement for achieving broader U.S. objectives.

                                           The Institute for the Study of War and Critical Threats Project at the American Enterprise Institute identified increasing regional instability and additional flashpoints as likely outcomes of the referendum in a joint estimate and forecast published in September 2017.

Posted by Institute for the Study of War at 2:07 PM 

Category: International

Leave a Reply

Το σχόλιο της ημέρας

    22/2/18 | (2 σχόλια)
    Μακράν καλύτερος ο Βενιζέλος στη χθεσινή συζήτηση στη Βουλή. Τους έκανε μάθημα. Ο Τσίπρας ... δεν μπορούσε να καταλάβει πως είναι δυνατόν να υπάρχει και σκάνδαλο και σκευωρία... Προφανώς, περνάει τον "όχλο", όπως αποκάλεσε το λαό, για ηλίθιο. Όλο το ...

Ροή ειδήσεων


Το σκίτσο της ημέρας